MAPS OF HISTORY · IB HISTORY · PAPER 1 · CLIMATE AND INNOVATION
IB HISTORY · PAPER 1 · FOCUSED STUDY
Paper 1: Climate and Innovation — Norse world and Aztec Empire
Climate and Innovation is one of the five Paper 1 Focused Studies of the new IB History course, first examined in May 2028. Paper 1 is the source paper: its questions ask you to read primary sources closely, to judge what each can and cannot tell a historian, and to combine them with your own knowledge. This Focused Study pairs two case studies, Norse world and Aztec Empire, and our atlas Climate and Innovation covers both on linked maps, in 12 chapters with 46 primary sources.
In the warm centuries Norse farmers sailed to Greenland; they left as the cold returned. In another demanding climate, the Mexica made a city of 200,000 from a salty lake.

WW2 is free in full, and chapter 1 of every atlas is free. A free account opens 3 more chapters a day. Opening a new atlas uses one of them. Membership opens all 21 — Join.
What this Focused Study asks
Each source set begins with an inquiry question. Together, the questions show the work this Focused Study asks you to do. Read the sources alongside the chapters: a good answer draws on both.
Norse world
- Where do saga accounts and archaeology agree about Norse voyages to North America?
- How did Iceland’s early settlers organise life in a new land?
- How do these sources describe sea ice and Norse responses in Greenland?
Aztec Empire
- How did Mexica communities and rulers respond to frost, drought and flood?
- What evidence shows how Tenochtitlan obtained food and other goods?
- How do these sources explain the fall of Tenochtitlan in 1521?
Case study 1: Norse world
Chapters 2–6 of the atlas follow Norse world, from 790 to 1450. Read them in order: each chapter is a step in one argument, and the map moves with it.
- The Ship and the Sea RoadCHAPTER 2 · c. 790–900
- Iceland: A Society on a Volcanic IslandCHAPTER 3 · 870–1000
- Greenland and VinlandCHAPTER 4 · 985–1050
- Living with the ColdCHAPTER 5 · 1250–1450
- What the Norse LeftCHAPTER 6 · c. 1100–1450
Evidence to use
One point from the IB notes of each chapter, written as a sentence you could use in an answer. Every chapter in the atlas carries four to six.
- The Oseberg ship was built around 820 and buried in 834. It was 21.5 metres long, with fifteen pairs of oars. Its clinker hull, made from overlapping riveted planks, flexed with the waves and drew only about a metre of water. CH 2
- Ari Þorgilsson wrote Íslendingabók in the 1120s, long after settlement. He says the island was settled within sixty winters and describes it as wooded “between fell and fore-shore”, preserving an account of a landscape different from the later one. CH 3
- In 985 or 986, Erik the Red led 25 ships from Iceland toward Greenland; 14 arrived. Settlers built about 500 farms in the Eastern Settlement and 75–100 in the Western Settlement, using the warm inner fjords for pasture. CH 4
- What did the Greenlanders eat as conditions changed? Bone chemistry from 123 Norse skeletons suggests a marked shift: marine food rose from roughly 15–50 percent of the early colony’s diet to 50–80 percent by the fourteenth century. The Greenlanders were eating far more seal. CH 5
- Around the year 1000, fish bones at English sites show a sudden rise in sea fish. James Barrett calls this change the fish event horizon. Isotope studies trace much of the later cod to northern Norway, where the stockfish trade had its home. CH 6
Case study 2: Aztec Empire
Chapters 7–11 of the atlas follow Aztec Empire, from 1325 to 1521. Read them in order: each chapter is a step in one argument, and the map moves with it.
- An Empire Built on a LakeCHAPTER 7 · 1325–1428
- Water: Dikes, Aqueducts and FloodsCHAPTER 8 · 1428–1500
- Chinampas: Feeding a CityCHAPTER 9 · c. 1430–1519
- The Planned CityCHAPTER 10 · c. 1430–1519
- The Flower Wars and the End of the SystemCHAPTER 11 · 1450s–1521
Evidence to use
One point from the IB notes of each chapter, written as a sentence you could use in an answer. Every chapter in the atlas carries four to six.
- The Basin of Mexico lies about 2,240 metres above sea level and covers roughly 7,500–9,600 square kilometres. At high water its linked lakes spread over some 1,000–1,500 square kilometres: the water was salty in the east at Texcoco and fresh in the south. CH 7
- After the flood usually dated to 1449, Nezahualcoyotl designed a dike to protect the city. Workers from Tlacopan, Culhuacan, Iztapalapa, Tenayuca and Xochimilco built the stone, clay and stake barrier, which ran some 12–16 kilometres from Atzacoalco to Iztapalapa. CH 8
- Chinampas began as plots staked out in shallow fresh water. Farmers piled lake mud and vegetation inside them and anchored their edges with ahuejote willows, making moist, fertile beds that could carry several crops a year. CH 9
- Tenochtitlan’s sacred precinct stood at the heart of the city and measured roughly 430–460 metres across. Sahagún’s informants listed 78 structures inside it; the twin shrines of the Templo Mayor, dedicated to Huitzilopochtli and Tlaloc, dominated the precinct. CH 10
- According to Alva Ixtlilxochitl, the Triple Alliance agreed in 1454 to fight Tlaxcala, Huexotzinco and Cholula in ritual flower wars to take captives. Ross Hassig interprets these wars as a form of attrition; Barry Isaac sees the ritual explanation as a cover for failure to conquer. CH 11
Comparing the two case studies
The atlas ends by setting the two case studies side by side in Two Answers to the Environment. Comparison is where the Focused Study pays off: the same question asked of two societies shows which explanations travel and which belong to one place.
PAPER 2 · CLIMATE AND INNOVATION · CHAPTER 12
Compare and contrast how the Norse in Greenland and the Mexica in the Basin of Mexico responded to the challenges of their environments.
Both societies developed ways to make demanding environments productive, and both looked beyond their homelands for resources through trade or tribute. Their circumstances and responses differed in scale: the Norse combined mobility with adaptation across a scattered environment, while the Mexica used engineering and empire in a concentrated one. Those differences also shaped the pressures each society faced at its end.
Both extended the possibilities of farming through innovation.
Both drew resources from beyond their homelands.
The societies differed greatly in scale and in the ways they ended.
The evidence for each point, the counter-argument and the judgement are in the IB notes of chapter 12 in the atlas. Read the chapter first: Two Answers to the Environment.
Key concepts
The course asks you to think with six concepts. Each chapter’s IB notes name the two or three it supports best; here they are across the atlas, most used first.
- Significance · 8 CHAPTERS
Why an event, person or idea matters, judged by its effects and by how it has been remembered. For example: Climate as a Force in History, The Ship and the Sea Road, Greenland and Vinland, What the Norse Left. - Causation · 7 CHAPTERS
Why something happened: the long-term conditions, the triggers and the choices behind it, and which of them mattered most. For example: Climate as a Force in History, The Ship and the Sea Road, Greenland and Vinland, Living with the Cold. - Change · 7 CHAPTERS
What was different afterwards, how quickly it changed, and for whom. For example: The Ship and the Sea Road, Iceland: A Society on a Volcanic Island, Living with the Cold, What the Norse Left. - Perspectives · 7 CHAPTERS
How people at the time, and historians since, have seen the same events differently, and why. For example: Climate as a Force in History, Iceland: A Society on a Volcanic Island, Greenland and Vinland, Living with the Cold. - Consequence · 5 CHAPTERS
What followed from an event or decision, intended and unintended, in the short and the long term. For example: Iceland: A Society on a Volcanic Island, Water: Dikes, Aqueducts and Floods, Chinampas: Feeding a City, The Flower Wars and the End of the System. - Continuity · 2 CHAPTERS
What stayed the same through an apparent upheaval, and why it survived. For example: What the Norse Left, Two Answers to the Environment.
Source-analysis practice
This is one complete source set from the atlas, free to use. It is built around one inquiry question: Where do saga accounts and archaeology agree about Norse voyages to North America? As you read each source, ask who made it, when, and why. These details help you judge what it can tell you. Answer the questions in writing first; then open the guide under each one to see what a strong answer does.
TEXT · CHAPTER 4
The Saga of the Greenlanders on Leif’s winter in Vinland
- CREATOR
- Anonymous Icelandic author
- DATE
- Thirteenth century (copied in Flateyjarbók, 1387–94)
- ORIGIN
- Grænlendinga saga (The Saga of the Greenlanders)
Context. The Vinland sagas differ over the first arrival and the place of wintering. This account gives Leif Eriksson the leading role.
Translation: A.M. Reeves, The Finding of Wineland the Good (London: Henry Frowde, 1890), pp. 65–66. · original ↗
TEXT · CHAPTER 4
The Saga of the Greenlanders on trade with the Skrælings
- CREATOR
- Anonymous Icelandic author
- DATE
- Thirteenth century (copied in Flateyjarbók, 1387–94)
- ORIGIN
- Grænlendinga saga, the expedition of Thorfinn Karlsefni
Context. “Skrellings” is a Norse term for the Indigenous people encountered. The passage reports the exchange from the Norse perspective.
Translation: A.M. Reeves, The Finding of Wineland the Good (London: Henry Frowde, 1890), p. 73. · original ↗
PICTURE · CHAPTER 4
Reconstructed Norse buildings at L’Anse aux Meadows
- CREATOR
- Photograph by Eric Titcombe
- DATE
- 2013 (reconstructions built by Parks Canada)
- ORIGIN
- L’Anse aux Meadows National Historic Site, Newfoundland
Context. These modern reconstructions stand beside excavated remains, discovered in 1960 and investigated in 1961–68 and 1973–76.

Eric Titcombe, “L’Anse aux Meadows - Exterior of reconstructed Viking house”, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons. · original ↗
PICTURE · CHAPTER 1
The opening of the Saga of the Greenlanders in Flateyjarbók
- CREATOR
- Scribes Jón Þórðarson and Magnús Þórhallsson
- DATE
- 1387–1394
- ORIGIN
- Manuscript page, GKS 1005 fol., Árni Magnússon Institute for Icelandic Studies, Reykjavík
Context. The saga describes voyages to Greenland and Vinland, but this manuscript was written in Iceland almost four centuries after them.

Flateyjarbók, GKS 1005 fol., Árni Magnússon Institute; image via Wikimedia Commons (public domain). · original ↗
The questions
- QUESTION 1 · COMPREHENSION
What attractions of the wintering place does Source A describe?
What a strong answer does
Leif’s crew found salmon in the river and lake larger than any they had seen. The winters seemed mild enough for cattle to go without fodder, with no frost, and day and night were more nearly equal in length. Choose three distinct attractions from the source and support them with brief quotation or close paraphrase.
- Gives three separate points from the source
- Uses brief quotation or close paraphrase
- Stays within the source
- QUESTION 2 · ANALYSIS
What can Source C tell us about the Norse site at L’Anse aux Meadows?
What a strong answer does
Look first at the low, turf-walled halls on open, treeless ground beside the sea. Their size and form suggest substantial winter shelter for a group, built with local turf in a tradition familiar from Iceland and Greenland. The buildings in the photograph are modern reconstructions beside the excavated remains, so they show an interpretation of the site.
- Makes inferences from what is visible
- Links the building style to the Norse homeland
- Notes that the buildings are reconstructions
- QUESTION 3 · EVALUATION
Assess Source D’s value and limitations for studying westward Norse voyages, using its origin, purpose and content.
What a strong answer does
Flateyjarbók preserves the Saga of the Greenlanders, the fuller of the two Vinland sagas, and offers evidence of how fourteenth-century Icelanders recorded their past. Yet it was written in Iceland in 1387–94, almost four centuries after the voyages. Oral transmission and the purpose of honoring Icelandic families descended from the explorers also bear on how directly it can tell us about those events.
- Uses origin, purpose and content explicitly
- Gives at least one value and one limitation
- Links each point to the question
- QUESTION 4 · SYNTHESIS
Using the sources and your own knowledge, how far does distance explain the end of the Norse presence in North America?
What a strong answer does
L’Anse aux Meadows was about 1,800 kilometers from Greenland’s Eastern Settlement, whose population may have been only 2,000–2,500. Distance and the small population could make a settlement difficult to sustain. Set these pressures beside the attractions and uneasy Indigenous encounters in A and B, the short-lived site reconstructed in C, and the 1021 tree-ring date before deciding how much weight distance deserves.
- Uses at least three of the sources
- Adds accurate own knowledge
- Weighs distance against other factors
- Reaches a clear judgement
More source sets in the atlas
The atlas holds 5 more source sets for this Focused Study. Their sources sit in the IB notes of the chapters named below: open a chapter in the atlas and turn on the IB notes switch to read them.
- How did Iceland’s early settlers organise life in a new land? NORSE WORLD
Its sources are in the IB notes of chapter 3. - How do these sources describe sea ice and Norse responses in Greenland? NORSE WORLD
Its sources are in the IB notes of chapter 1, chapter 5. - How did Mexica communities and rulers respond to frost, drought and flood? AZTEC EMPIRE
Its sources are in the IB notes of chapter 1, chapter 8. - What evidence shows how Tenochtitlan obtained food and other goods? AZTEC EMPIRE
Its sources are in the IB notes of chapter 9. - How do these sources explain the fall of Tenochtitlan in 1521? AZTEC EMPIRE
Its sources are in the IB notes of chapter 11.
Practice questions and essay plans
Try planning your answers before looking at ours. Each outline states a thesis and shows what each paragraph would claim. The first plan comes from chapter 2, a free chapter, and is shown in full. In the atlas, the chapters’ IB notes give the full plans, with evidence, a counter-argument and a judgement. The atlas’s own page lists those notes: IB notes for The Norse and the Aztecs.
PAPER 2 · CLIMATE AND INNOVATION · CHAPTER 2
Evaluate the importance of technological innovation in causing the Viking expansion of the late eighth and ninth centuries.
The longship was necessary for Viking expansion: it made the journeys possible. But the ability to travel does not by itself explain why people set out. Social pressures at home and opportunities for silver and trade abroad helped turn ships into instruments of a larger movement.
The clinker-built ship made distant raids and settlement possible.
EVIDENCEOseberg, buried in 834, and Gokstad, built around 890, were light and flexible vessels that drew only about a metre of water. Their crews could cross the North Sea, row up rivers and beach without a harbour.
LINKThese capabilities made ventures such as the surprise raid on Lindisfarne in 793 and settlement on the islands possible.
Pressures within Scandinavian society may explain the willingness to raid.
EVIDENCEJames Barrett in 2008 and Raffield, Price and Collard in 2017 argued that a surplus of young men without land or the wealth owed to a bride’s family made risky raids attractive. In Norway, only about 3 percent of the land can be ploughed.
LINKShips existed before 793. Social change may therefore help explain why raids began when they did, although the relative importance of these pressures remains debated.
Silver and trade offered reasons to undertake voyages.
EVIDENCEScandinavia has yielded hundreds of thousands of Islamic dirhams, while Kaupang and Hedeby were thriving trading towns. Around 890 Ohthere told King Alfred about walrus ivory and furs taken as tribute from the Sámi.
LINKThe prospect of wealth gave chieftains reasons to send ships out year after year, for exchange as well as raiding.
Technology has a strong claim to be decisive. The sail reached Scandinavia only around the seventh or eighth century, transforming what ships could do shortly before the raids began. Lise Bender Jørgensen’s estimate that a warship’s woollen sail required more than 1.5 tonnes of wool and decades of women’s labour also shows how much had to be invested in it.
Ships were indispensable, and the arrival of the sail helps explain the timing of expansion. Yet a sail also required a society willing to devote decades of labour to it. The social and economic forces behind that investment and the voyages were the deeper cause; innovation worked within a wider system of ambition, trade and status.
Read the chapter behind this plan: The Ship and the Sea Road.
PAPER 2 · CLIMATE AND INNOVATION · CHAPTER 5
To what extent was climate change the main reason Norse Greenland was abandoned?
Climate change put pressure on Greenland’s farmers, but it cannot explain the departure by itself. Cooling and drying narrowed the margin for cattle farming; economic decline and isolation added to those pressures, while the Norse adapted and Inuit survived in the same cold. Climate acted through the vulnerabilities of the colony.
Cooling and drying weakened the farming base.
The Norse changed their diet, limiting a purely climatic explanation.
Economic change and isolation weakened the colony’s ties to Europe.
The evidence for each point, the counter-argument and the judgement are in the IB notes of chapter 5 in the atlas. Read the chapter first: Living with the Cold.
PAPER 2 · CLIMATE AND INNOVATION · CHAPTER 9
Examine how important chinampas and the tribute system were in sustaining Tenochtitlan’s population.
The city drew on several connected sources of supply. Chinampas produced fresh food near Tenochtitlan, tribute brought staples and goods from other climates, and markets helped distribute goods to households. Both farming and tribute were essential, though their relative shares are uncertain; neither alone could have fed a city of perhaps 200,000.
Chinampas gave the city a productive source of food close at hand.
Tribute linked the capital to supplies from regions with different climates.
The market at Tlatelolco connected these supplies with households.
The evidence for each point, the counter-argument and the judgement are in the IB notes of chapter 9 in the atlas. Read the chapter first: Chinampas: Feeding a City.
PAPER 2 · CLIMATE AND INNOVATION · CHAPTER 11
To what extent was Indigenous opposition to the Mexica the main reason for the fall of Tenochtitlan in 1521?
Indigenous opposition was the main reason Tenochtitlan fell: it gave the Spaniards an army, a base and local knowledge that their few hundred men lacked. Smallpox and the lake city’s vulnerability accelerated the outcome, while Spanish ships and steel mattered most in combination with allied manpower.
Indigenous allies furnished both an army and a refuge.
Smallpox weakened Tenochtitlan before the siege began.
The lake city’s connections gave the besiegers targets.
The evidence for each point, the counter-argument and the judgement are in the IB notes of chapter 11 in the atlas. Read the chapter first: The Flower Wars and the End of the System.
Revision tools
The atlas ends with a map quiz that asks you to find places and moments on the map itself (part of every plan from Starter up). The quick quiz and the discussion questions with our answers are free pages on this site, and the printable study guide gathers every chapter’s notes into one document for revision.
The same atlas for other papers
Several chapters also carry IB notes for Papers 2 and 3, and for topics of the old course examined in 2027:
- Paper 2 · Conflict · 1 CHAPTERS
- Paper 2 · Innovation and Transformation · 11 CHAPTERS
Maps of History is independent and is not affiliated with or endorsed by the International Baccalaureate Organization. IB course names describe alignment only; paper, theme and section names follow the new course outline and may change when the final guide is published.
THE DISPATCH
Get the printable study guide for Climate and Innovation free. I’ll send you a few short letters, then one when a new atlas opens. That’s all. — Paul
NO TRACKING · YOUR ADDRESS IS USED FOR THE DISPATCH AND NOTHING ELSE · UNSUBSCRIBE ANYTIME