Haiti and Kenya independence · CHAPTER 11 ·
Kenya after independence
Chapter 11 of Two Roads to Independence: Haiti 1789–1838 and Kenya 1895–1978: “Challenges after Independence”
Independent Kenya inherited the colony’s borders, land map and divisions. Somali-speaking northerners fought the Shifta War of 1963–67; the government bought settler farms and resettled about 35,000 families, while many of the best farms passed whole to a new African elite; and KADU merged into KANU in 1964 as politics narrowed.
Chapter 11 is included with every paid plan. WW2 is free in full, and chapter 1 of every atlas is free. A free account opens 3 more chapters a day. Starter, at $9 a month, opens all 21 with no daily limit — see the plans.
Free printable Haiti and Kenya independence study guide, sent by email ↓
The map above is the world of Kenya, 1964–67 — The Shifta War; the Kinangop resettled.
Every state on the map that year: The world in 1970 · Europe in 1970.
Part of IB History: Haiti and Kenya →
SHORT EXPLANATION
Kenya’s independence left its leaders with a country whose borders and land ownership had been decided under colonial rule. Somali-speaking communities in the north-east had wanted to join Somalia. Instead, they became part of Kenya, and the Shifta War of 1963–67 followed, shaded grey on the map. Shifta means bandit: the government’s name treated the insurgents as criminals rather than people with a political cause, a practice states still use today.
In the former White Highlands, British loans helped the government buy settler farms and resettle about 35,000 families. The Kinangop has consequently lost its charcoal on the map. Purchase also determined who could acquire land: many of the best farms went whole to a new African elite. Meanwhile, political opposition lost room to operate. KADU merged into KANU in 1964 and the regions lost their powers; Oginga Odinga’s Kenya People’s Union (KPU), founded in 1966 to demand land for the poor, was harried and banned in 1969.
Tom Mboya’s killing in July 1969 and the shooting of protesters at Kisumu that October deepened the division between Kikuyu and Luo. By Kenyatta’s death in 1978, Kenya was stable and growing, but only the ruling party could organize freely. Independence had been won through bargaining and purchase, leaving much of the colonial economy in place and its rewards available chiefly to those able to acquire them.
The full story
The people of Kenya’s north-east had reason to question the border the new government was determined to defend. A British commission found in 1962 that most Somali-speaking people in the Northern Frontier District wanted to join the new Somali Republic. Britain nevertheless placed their districts in a Kenyan region. Independence had changed who governed the territory, while leaving the colonial boundary in place.
Within weeks of independence, Kenya declared an emergency there. Insurgents of the Northern Province People’s Progressive Party, armed and sheltered by Somalia, attacked police posts and convoys on the routes toward Wajir traced by the arrows. The army seized herds and imposed collective punishment. From 1967 it forced herders into guarded villages, drawing on a method used during the Emergency. Estimates put the dead at about 4,000 to over 10,000. The October 1967 Arusha Memorandum, brokered by Zambia’s president, ended the war; the Kenyan border held.
The land settlement addressed another grievance inherited from colonial rule. Under the Million-Acre Scheme, begun in 1962, the government used mainly British loans to buy just over a million acres from about 780 European farmers. By 1971 around 35,000 families had settled on small plots near Ol Kalou and the Kinangop, where the brown arrow leads. This was a substantial transfer of ownership. Yet the families paid for their plots, buying back land their parents had lost.
Purchase had different consequences for people with different resources. Under the principle of “willing buyer, willing seller”, larger farms were sold whole to buyers able to raise capital: politicians, civil servants, loyalist landholders from the Emergency and Kenyatta’s own family. Many forest fighters and former detainees were left out. The farms became African-owned, but the distribution of land was not transformed.
The struggle over political power had its own casualties. The radical politician Pio Gama Pinto was shot dead outside his Nairobi home in 1965. In April 1966 Vice-President Odinga resigned and founded the left-wing Kenya People’s Union (KPU). A constitutional amendment required its members of parliament to seek election again, and most lost their seats.
On 5 July 1969 Tom Mboya, a Luo and KANU’s most able organizer, was shot dead in central Nairobi. Mass oathing at Kenyatta’s home bound many Kikuyu to the ruling circle. At Kisumu on 25 October, Kenyatta’s guards fired on hostile crowds, killing at least eleven; five days later the government banned the KPU and detained Odinga. The state had used powers inherited from colonial rule against its own opponents. Kenyatta died at Mombasa on 22 August 1978, and Daniel arap Moi succeeded him peacefully.
FULL EXPLANATION
The Shifta War and the problem of inherited borders
The border question had implications beyond Kenya. Somalia’s five-pointed star represented the five territories in which Somalis lived, and its leaders claimed Kenya’s north-east as one of them. The Northern Frontier District Commission found in December 1962 that the predominantly Somali east wanted union with Somalia, while most of the west opposed secession. Britain, unwilling to anger Kenya’s new leaders, created the North-Eastern Region instead. Other African governments feared the consequences of reopening inherited borders: in Cairo in July 1964 the Organisation of African Unity resolved that its members would respect them, giving Kenya continental backing. Hannah Whittaker’s Insurgency and Counterinsurgency in Kenya (2014) shows how the new state reused Emergency methods, including forced villagisation into some fourteen guarded settlements from 1967. The closed military zone left little record of the dead; estimates range from about 4,200 to more than 10,000. Kenya secured the border, and for decades afterward governed the north-east as a frontier.
Who got the land?
European ownership gave way to African ownership, but historians ask which Africans gained. The Million-Acre Scheme settled about 35,000 families by 1971. Land-buying companies and cooperatives also enabled groups of poorer Kikuyu to pool savings and buy farms in the Rift Valley, along the migration route marked by the brown arrow. Colin Leys argued in Underdevelopment in Kenya (1975) that the purchase model was neo-colonial: British loans protected settler capital while putting Kenyans in debt. Christopher Leo’s Land and Class in Kenya (1984) traced the largest estates to a new African elite. Kikuyu settlement in the Rift Valley revived fears that had helped produce majimbo; those fears fed violence in 1992 and 2007–08. The former detainee and politician J. M. Kariuki warned against a Kenya of ten millionaires and ten million beggars; he was murdered in March 1975. The peaceful independence bargain had left the deepest colonial land grievance unresolved.
Not yet uhuru: judging the Kenyatta state
Odinga gave his 1967 memoir the title Not Yet Uhuru, meaning “not yet freedom”. His judgment invites us to examine what independence had changed and what it had left in place. Charles Hornsby’s Kenya: A History Since Independence (2012) and Daniel Branch’s Kenya: Between Hope and Despair (2011) describe a government that retained colonial provincial administration, detention laws and centralized power and used them against opponents. Sessional Paper No. 10 of 1965, drafted under Mboya, invoked African socialism while endorsing private property and foreign investment; that capitalist path attracted Western aid during the Cold War. Kenyatta’s defenders point to stability, rising school enrollment, expanding African smallholder farming and the peaceful succession of 1978, rare achievements among states newly independent in the 1960s. Parliamentary elections continued within the single party, and many incumbents lost. These achievements belong in the judgment alongside the choice to use inherited tools and habits against opponents. Kenya became a one-party state in law only in 1982, under Moi.
Key places on the map
On this day
Why it happened
Borders drawn by the colony. Britain’s boundary placed a Somali-speaking majority in the north-east within Kenya. The 1962 commission found that many wanted to join Somalia, but its findings were set aside so the new Kenyan state would begin intact. People whose preference had been established were placed in a country they had rejected. London’s decision, confirmed in Nairobi, was followed within weeks of independence by war.
Land settled by purchase. The independence bargain protected property and made purchase the means of transferring land. British loans financed much of the scheme, but individual buyers still needed savings or credit. People with money or office could acquire the best farms; poorer families obtained small plots on credit or nothing. Former detainees and forest fighters who had lost land during the Emergency often had least to bring to the market. A settlement that helped keep the transition peaceful also built inequality into it.
A state built for control. The independent government inherited provincial administrators, detention powers, a strong police force and a habit of governing by decree. These had served a colonial state concerned with keeping order over a reluctant population, and the Emergency sharpened them. KANU dismantled the regions while retaining the other instruments. The machinery once used against Mau Mau was available against the KPU.
Rival visions inside the ruling party. KANU’s leaders agreed on independence without agreeing on what should follow. Odinga and Bildad Kaggia wanted free land for the poor and closer ties with socialist states. Mboya and Kenyatta favored private property, foreign investment and Western aid. Money and support from abroad sharpened the disagreement during the Cold War. Odinga’s departure in 1966 turned it into a contest between parties, which the state chose to win by force.
THE TURNING POINT
Government Road, Nairobi, 5 July 1969. Tom Mboya’s assassination removed a leading possible successor to Kenyatta and intensified the ethnic divisions around political power. A Luo trade unionist, Mboya had built KANU’s organization and its links with the United States; he was its strongest non-Kikuyu candidate for the succession. He was shot outside a Nairobi chemist’s shop on 5 July 1969. A Kikuyu gunman was hanged, though many Kenyans believed others had ordered the killing. Luo anger exploded at Kisumu in October. Gunfire, the KPU ban and Odinga’s detention followed, leaving Kenya a one-party state in practice. The pattern of ethnic succession politics established in 1969 has shaped every Kenyan election since.
What it changed
A peaceful succession, a narrower state. The constitution provided for succession when Kenyatta died in August 1978, and it worked: Vice-President Moi, a former KADU leader, took office without violence, a rare event in Africa at the time. He first promised continuity, then tightened control and made Kenya a one-party state in law in 1982. The epilogue considers how far this outcome followed from the manner of independence.
Ethnic arithmetic in politics. After 1969, political bargains increasingly joined ethnic blocs: leaders delivered their communities’ votes in exchange for jobs, roads and land. The colonial habit of governing by tribe had acquired a new role in the independent state. Presidential succession became a test of whether communities could share power, and the crises of 1992 and 2007–08 grew from this logic.
The landless remember. For people who remained landless, and for neglected Mau Mau veterans, the Emergency was part of a history that the official account of peaceful handover left out. Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o and other novelists made the betrayed fighter a central figure in Kenyan literature. Veterans’ groups pressed for recognition and compensation; their campaign succeeded only in the twenty-first century, as the epilogue shows.
DISCUSSION QUESTION — How far did the manner of Kenya’s independence shape its challenges between 1963 and 1978?
The settlement explains much of the new state’s predicament. Negotiated independence preserved colonial borders, a market in land and a centralized state. The north-east fought a secession war, many remained landless, and the machinery of the Emergency was available against political opponents. But Kenyan leaders also made choices: they abolished the regions, harassed the KPU, retained detention without trial and allowed elite families to accumulate great estates. Somalia’s claims and Cold War funding for rival factions mattered too. The settlement narrowed the options without deciding how every inherited power would be used. The epilogue compares Haiti, where outright victory in war left a different but equally heavy inheritance.
An interesting fact
A colonial detention power reached into Kenya’s literary life in December 1977, when the novelist Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o was held without trial at Kamiti prison. Months earlier, villagers at Kamiriithu had staged Ngaahika Ndeenda, a Gikuyu (Kikuyu) language play he wrote with Ngũgĩ wa Mĩriĩ, (“I Will Marry When I Want”), which mocked the new elite. In his cell he wrote Caitaani Mũtharaba-inĩ (“Devil on the Cross”) on prison toilet paper. Released in December 1978 after Kenyatta’s death, he went on writing fiction in Gikuyu, arguing that decolonising the mind had to begin with language. A law made to hold Mau Mau suspects had been used to silence the movement’s greatest novelist.
Related
THE FREE PRINTABLE STUDY GUIDE
Get the printable study guide for Two Roads to Independence free. I’ll send you a few short letters, then one when a new atlas opens. That’s all. — Paul
NO TRACKING · YOUR ADDRESS IS USED FOR THE DISPATCH AND NOTHING ELSE · UNSUBSCRIBE ANYTIME