Skip to content
Maps of History Start free

Norse and Aztecs · 1500

Did the Norse or the Aztecs respond better to climate?

The seminar question: “Which society’s response to its environment was more successful, and by what standard should success be judged?”

The Norse met a cold, scattered environment with mobility: ships, seasonal hunting, trade and assemblies. The Mexica met a rich but closed lake basin with concentration: dikes, aqueducts, raised fields and a tribute empire feeding perhaps 200,000 people. Norse Greenland, of perhaps 2,000–2,500 people, had no reserves.

Open this map in the interactive atlas →

Chapter 12 is included with every paid plan. WW2 is free in full, and chapter 1 of every atlas is free. A free account opens 3 more chapters a day. Starter, at $9 a month, opens all 21 with no daily limit — see the plans.

Free printable Norse and Aztecs study guide, sent by email ↓

Map of Norse and Aztecs compared (1500)
1500 · CLIMATE AND INNOVATION: THE NORSE AND THE AZTECS, C. 790–1521

Climate entered the two histories on different timescales. Relatively warm conditions around 950–1250 made farming possible in Greenland's fjords. Cooling after roughly 1275–1300, and drying near the Eastern Settlement, narrowed the margin on which farms depended. Greenlanders ate more seals and changed their trade as they adjusted to the pressures on their colony.

The short answer

THE TURNING POINT

Hvalsey and Tenochtitlan: two kinds of ending. Hvalsey's church remains among abandoned Norse farms; colonial Mexico City rose over Tenochtitlan's ruins. Placed together, they show two different endings. Archaeology suggests orderly departure from some Greenland farms, although the choices and fates of all their inhabitants remain unknown. A small, distant society withdrew under accumulating pressures. Tenochtitlan fell in a violent siege, after which new rulers changed its lake system. The two endings differed in pace and in the evidence they left.

What it changed

Greenland becomes an Inuit land, then a Danish colony. Inuit communities had spread along Greenland's west and south coasts by about 1500. Danish colonization began in the eighteenth century and shaped the island for two hundred years. Greenland's colonial status ended in 1953; Home Rule followed in 1979 and Self-Government in 2009. In 2017 Kujataa, the farming landscape that includes Hvalsey and is associated with both Norse and Inuit farming, entered the World Heritage list.

The lake becomes a sinking city. One of the world's largest cities grew on the former lake bed. Pumping groundwater compacts its soft clay, and in some places, especially where that clay is thickest, the ground sinks by up to about 50 centimeters a year. Mexico City still faces flooding and water-supply problems. The challenge of living with water in a closed basin has endured for five centuries.

A question for the present. How can societies adapt to a demanding climate, and which responses will last? That question now faces people dealing with climate change. These histories suggest examining whether resources, places, people and institutions spread risk or concentrate it, and whether institutions can change with conditions. Students can test that argument against the evidence and the differences between the cases.

The full answer, argued

We need a standard before choosing a winner. By scale and achievement, the Mexica sustained Tenochtitlan, a city of perhaps 200,000, through dikes, aqueducts, chinampas and tribute; their networks helped them survive famine and flood. Norse Greenland held at most a few thousand people and was abandoned. By duration, the comparison changes: Norse Greenland lasted about 450 years, longer than the Mexica empire's century of dominance after 1428, and Iceland still has its assembly and literature. Both traditions also left innovations in use: clinker construction, stockfish and the Althing on one side, chinampas on the other. Neither ending can be attributed to climate alone. Economic and other pressures accumulated in Greenland; a coalition and epidemic confronted Tenochtitlan. A judgment of success should therefore identify its standard and consider the time over which a system worked and the human and natural shocks it faced.

An interesting fact

When the Norwegian priest Hans Egede sailed from Bergen in 1721, he hoped to find descendants of Greenland's medieval Norse settlers and bring them into the Lutheran church. Scandinavians did not know whether they had survived. Egede found Inuit communities, learned their language and stayed to work among them. His first mission was on a small island. In 1728 the colony moved to the mainland under Governor Claus Paarss as Godthåb, now Nuuk, Greenland's capital. The mission intended for the vanished Norse became part of the beginning of Danish rule over the Inuit who lived there.

This is the study layer of Norse and Aztecs compared, chapter 12 of Climate and Innovation: The Norse and the Aztecs, c. 790–1521; the full index of the atlas is here.

Related questions

THE FREE PRINTABLE STUDY GUIDE

Get the printable study guide for Climate and Innovation free. I’ll send you a few short letters, then one when a new atlas opens. That’s all. — Paul

NO TRACKING · YOUR ADDRESS IS USED FOR THE DISPATCH AND NOTHING ELSE · UNSUBSCRIBE ANYTIME