Crusades · CHAPTER 4 · THE MILITARY ORDERS
Knights Templar and Hospitallers
Chapter 4 of The Crusades, 1095–1291: “Europe’s First Standing Institutions”
The Templars, founded around 1120 to protect pilgrims, and the Hospitallers joined monastic vows to permanent military service. Donations, papal privileges and recruitment across Christendom let them hold frontier castles such as Krak des Chevaliers and move money, but their independence made them hard for kings to command.
Chapter 4 is included with every paid plan. WW2 is free in full, and chapter 1 of every atlas is free. A free account opens 3 more chapters a day. Starter, at $9 a month, opens all 21 with no daily limit — see the plans.
The map above is the world of The Crusades, 1153 — Ascalon — the peak of Outremer.
Part of IB History: The Crusades →
SHORT EXPLANATION
The crusader states needed soldiers who would remain after individual crusaders had fulfilled their vows and gone home. The military orders met that need by joining religious vows to lasting military service. Recruits and donations came from across Latin Christendom, while papal privileges protected the orders’ work. The Templars and Hospitallers guarded pilgrims, held frontier castles and helped transfer money between Europe and the eastern Mediterranean.
The orders could carry on through changes of rulers because they had property, rules and recruits of their own. Those same resources gave each order room to make its own decisions. A king of Jerusalem needed their forces but could not command them as ordinary royal troops; rivalry and independent judgment could make cooperation difficult when the kingdom faced danger.
The full story
A pilgrim traveling through the Holy Land faced dangerous roads, and around 1120 a small group of knights vowed to protect such travelers. They were given quarters on the Temple Mount and became known as the Templars. The Hospitallers had a different beginning: a brotherhood connected with a Jerusalem hospital grew into a fighting order.
Both brought together duties that did not fit an existing Christian category. Their members lived under religious vows of poverty and obedience, yet they were trained fighters. Bernard of Clairvaux supplied a theological defense of this vocation. The combination also answered a practical need in Outremer. A crusader could go home after fulfilling his vow; a frontier castle still needed a garrison the next year.
The orders could maintain such work because they were built to continue beyond individual lives. Written rules governed their communities, and recruitment and donations reached across Latin Christendom. Estates belonged to the order as a corporation rather than to a family whose heirs might divide them. Houses in Europe gathered people and money; in the East, commanders used resources to maintain fortresses. The Hospitallers held Krak des Chevaliers, among the great castles that kings could not permanently staff themselves.
That network served travelers as well as soldiers. A pilgrim could deposit funds in Paris and draw on them in Acre, reducing the need to carry coin across a dangerous journey. The orders could move resources over long distances because they had houses and administration at both ends.
Papal privileges helped protect those resources from local taxes and ecclesiastical control. The protection gave the orders stability, but it also limited a king’s authority over forces he needed. Each order had castles, revenues, intelligence and diplomacy of its own. Its judgment might check a weak ruler; different judgments and rivalry could also obstruct a common plan, as in the campaign before Hattin.
The problem was therefore more than a clash of personalities. Institutions able to maintain their own work across generations also possessed the means to resist direction. The orders survived the loss of the Holy Land, but political protection still mattered. Philip IV of France moved against the wealthy Templars from 1307, and the order was suppressed in 1312.
FULL EXPLANATION
The Technology Was Routine
A vow gave the orders a purpose; rules made that purpose a daily practice. Their written regulations covered clothing, meals, horses, prayer, discipline and the chain of command. Brothers in distant houses could be recruited and directed within an institution whose work did not end when its leader died. The property stayed with the corporation too, unlike an ordinary lordship that could be divided among heirs. This continuity mattered at the frontier: houses across Europe raised money and recruited members, while eastern commanders used those resources to keep fortresses garrisoned. The network had another use. It could record a deposit in one place and arrange payment in another, so that a traveler need not carry coin for the whole journey. These services adapted a wider medieval system of long-distance credit to pilgrimage and war. Administration, as well as religious commitment, let the orders sustain recognizable routines across generations.
Independence and Coordination
The king of Jerusalem needed forces that would stay, and the orders could supply them in part because papal privileges protected their men and wealth from local interference. That protection came with a difficulty for the king. He could ask for their help, but each order controlled its own castles, intelligence, diplomatic relationships and accumulated experience. Its leaders might use that independence to resist a poor royal decision. They might also disagree with the crown or with another order when their forces needed to act together. Economists call a related difficulty a principal–agent problem: a community relies on specialists who possess resources and information that make them hard to direct. The analogy shows why a change of personalities alone would not remove the tension. Less autonomy might have damaged the continuity that made the orders useful; keeping it made cooperation essential. Hattin revealed the danger of failed coordination, while the orders’ decades of service show why their independence had been valuable.
Key places on the map
Why it happened
The demographic gap demanded permanence. A crusader’s vow did not keep him in Outremer forever, but the castles required men year after year. The orders recruited celibate brothers under religious discipline and renewed their ranks through recruitment rather than birth. They supplied a lasting response to the shortage of knights discussed in Chapter 3.
Papal privilege built a supranational body. Papal exemptions protected the orders from tithes and aspects of local ecclesiastical authority. Their own leadership could gather resources and hold lands across Latin Christendom, beyond the limits of a single local lordship. This independence helped sustain the institutions and could also put them at odds with rulers.
The need to move money safely. Pilgrims and armies needed funds far from home, yet roads and seas made carrying coin hazardous. The orders’ houses handled deposits and transfers for travelers and for their own organizations. They adapted services from a wider medieval system of long-distance credit to the needs of the journey and the war.
THE TURNING POINT
Krak des Chevaliers — permanence in stone. For more than a century the Hospitallers held Krak des Chevaliers. Individual brothers died and rulers changed, while new recruits continued to staff the fortress. Its history shows what an enduring order could place on the frontier—and the limit of that endurance. In 1271 a forged instruction helped persuade the defenders to surrender.
What it changed
Standing armies before the state. The orders kept disciplined forces, property and financial networks in use beyond any one leader’s lifetime. Drawing resources from many territories, they carried military work across generations long before national states developed comparable continuity.
Rivalry that could be fatal. Each order had resources and a judgment of its own, which made rivalry over their use consequential. Competition and decisions by the orders contributed to the costly defeat at the Springs of Cresson, weeks before Hattin. The kingdom needed these forces even when cooperation between them failed.
The idea outlives the Holy Land. The loss of Outremer did not end the orders. Hospitallers established themselves on Rhodes and later Malta; Teutonic Knights operated in Prussia. The Templars faced a different future: Philip IV attacked them from 1307, the order was suppressed in 1312, and its last grand master was executed in 1314. Institutions could find new places and purposes, but their survival still depended on political protection.
DISCUSSION QUESTION — How could the military orders be at once the most effective and the most divisive institution in Outremer?
Papal protection and support from across Christendom gave the orders resources that could survive changes of rulers. They maintained castles and disciplined cavalry, providing a reliable core of defense for the kingdom. Yet the king could not simply command those forces as his own. The orders guarded their privileges, controlled their resources and formed judgments independently; rivalry with the crown or each other could obstruct a shared strategy. The independence that sustained their strength also made directing them harder.
An interesting fact
The Templar Rule reached into the details of a brother’s day. Roughly seventy clauses were approved at Troyes in 1129; the rule later grew to nearly seven hundred. A knight was allowed three horses and one squire. Pointed shoes and shoelaces were banned as worldly vanity, as was chess. Hunting was forbidden with one exception: the lion. Such instructions gave brothers in widely separated houses a common discipline, extending to matters a visitor might scarcely notice.
Related
THE FREE PRINTABLE STUDY GUIDE
Get the printable study guide for The Crusades free. I’ll send you a few short letters, then one when a new atlas opens. That’s all. — Paul
NO TRACKING · YOUR ADDRESS IS USED FOR THE DISPATCH AND NOTHING ELSE · UNSUBSCRIBE ANYTIME