Chinese Revolution · 1929
Was the Nanjing decade real modernisation or a façade?
The seminar question: “Was the Nanjing decade a real modernization interrupted, or a weak state exposed by Japan?”
In April 1927 Chiang Kai-shek’s forces and allied gangsters attacked Communists and unionists in Shanghai, ending the First United Front and driving the Communists into the countryside. Chiang completed the Northern Expedition in 1928, and Nanjing built banks, laws and industry, but its reach stayed narrow.
Chapter 5 is included with every paid plan. WW2 is free in full, and chapter 1 of every atlas is free. A free account opens 3 more chapters a day. Starter, at $9 a month, opens all 21 with no daily limit — see the plans.
Free printable Chinese Revolution study guide, sent by email ↓
The Nanjing Decade, the Nationalists’ main period of state-building from 1927 to 1937, began by destroying the alliance that had helped bring them to power. On 12 April 1927 Chiang Kai-shek’s forces turned on Communists and unionists in Shanghai (the ◆). National Revolutionary Army soldiers and Green Gang enforcers killed hundreds that morning; thousands more were killed across the south in the following weeks. The First United Front broke as the Northern Expedition approached victory.
The short answer
- Class conflict within the alliance. The United Front joined a revolution to an army whose officers and supporters came in part from landlord and merchant families. Peasant associations and Shanghai unions acted against those same interests: they were doing the work of the alliance’s left wing. By spring 1927 Chiang chose to protect his army’s social allies against the Communist-led revolution. The Green Gang helped enforce that choice; its labor rackets had themselves been challenged by the unions.
- Moscow and the failed risings. Stalin had committed himself to the Chinese alliance in his struggle with Trotsky. Moscow consequently told the CCP to remain in the United Front until the last moment. Once the alliance had broken, it called for insurrections at Nanchang, in the Autumn Harvest risings and in the Canton Commune of December 1927. All failed, and the party lost cadres it could scarcely spare. Moscow took defeats as reasons for further risings. Historians disagree about the relative weight of its decisions and Chinese conditions; the cost was borne in China. Mao’s later distrust of imported strategy grew from this experience and his work in the countryside.
- Reunification by agreement. The 1928 settlement gave Nanjing national allegiance without requiring Yan, Feng or the Guangxi clique to surrender their provinces and armies. Zhang Xueliang’s decision also defied his father’s Japanese patrons. Such agreements extended Chiang’s authority, but left other commanders able to resist him. When Nanjing tried to demobilize regional armies at the 1929 conference, the dispute helped lead to the Central Plains War. Japan would test the resulting weakness in 1931.
- The Kwantung Army and impunity. The officers who killed Zhang Zuolin at Huanggutun had acted against their own government’s client. Tokyo failed to punish the principal perpetrators effectively. An activist in the Kwantung Army could see that a completed action in Manchuria might escape civilian control without costing its authors their positions. In September 1931 the army acted there again, on a much larger scale.
THE TURNING POINT
Shanghai, 12 April 1927. Chiang’s victory in Shanghai settled the immediate struggle inside the alliance, but it also shaped the next twenty-two years of Chinese politics. The purge helped make civil war central, drove Communist survivors toward the countryside where their eventual winning strategy developed, and tied the Nationalist state more closely to banks, gangs and landlords whose interests constrained reform. The terms of victory helped determine the struggle to come.
What it changed
The revolution goes rural. The survivors found refuge where provincial authority was weak: first in the mountains of Jinggangshan, then on the Jiangxi–Fujian border. Mao and Zhu De began to combine land revolution, guerrilla war and government in base areas. The next chapter follows their experiment.
A decade of real, brittle state-building. The government recovered tariff autonomy in 1928–30, built roads and a modern capital, and established a new currency. Its finances still depended on the Yangtze delta and rural tax-farming. Lloyd Eastman stresses faction, debt and repression; revisionists emphasize modernization achieved under severe pressure. Chapter 12 returns to the evidence for both accounts.
Manchuria becomes the fuse. By joining Nanjing, Zhang Xueliang placed Manchuria under a government pledged to recover treaty rights on which Japanese interests depended. The Kwantung Army had both a stake in the region and an example of officers escaping effective punishment. Its seizure of Manchuria follows in the next chapter.
The full answer, argued
Lloyd Eastman’s The Abortive Revolution finds the seeds of destruction in the purge of idealists, factional bargains, chronic deficits, tax authority that stopped at the county town and reunification purchased from warlords. Revisionists look instead at the Maritime Customs, the fabi reform, legal codes and universities. They argue that, despite civil war and Japanese pressure, no Chinese government since the 1830s had recovered so much sovereignty or built administrative machinery so quickly. Both accounts capture something essential. Modernization was real, particularly around Shanghai, but reached few of the villages where about four-fifths of Chinese lived. The CCP was building a rival state in those villages. Seen as a contest between two incomplete states, Nanjing was losing the countryside before it lost a city to Japan. Its achievement matters; so does the question of whom it reached.
An interesting fact
In November 1935 Nanjing nationalized silver and introduced a managed paper currency, the fabi. For centuries Chinese money had been, in effect, weighed metal. The United States Silver Purchase Act of 1934 had driven up silver prices, drawn coin out of China and squeezed credit. With British advice, the government replaced it with notes that gained broad acceptance within months, while prices initially stabilized. A decade later, money printed to finance war contributed to the hyperinflation of 1947–49. The currency that helped solve one crisis became part of another.
This is the study layer of Shanghai purge and Nanjing decade, chapter 5 of China in Revolution, 1911–1949; the full index of the atlas is here.
Related questions
THE FREE PRINTABLE STUDY GUIDE
Get the printable study guide for China in Revolution free. I’ll send you a few short letters, then one when a new atlas opens. That’s all. — Paul
NO TRACKING · YOUR ADDRESS IS USED FOR THE DISPATCH AND NOTHING ELSE · UNSUBSCRIBE ANYTIME