Crusades · 1150
Was Outremer a colonial society or a frontier society?
The seminar question: “Was Outremer a colonial society, a frontier society, or something for which we have no clean word?”
For nearly two centuries the four crusader states of Outremer formed a thin coastal ribbon where a small Latin elite ruled larger Muslim and Eastern Christian populations. The Franks relied on castles such as Krak des Chevaliers and on Italian fleets paid with self-governing quarters, and lived by truces, taxes and trade.
Chapter 3 is included with every paid plan. WW2 is free in full, and chapter 1 of every atlas is free. A free account opens 3 more chapters a day. Starter, at $9 a month, opens all 21 with no daily limit — see the plans.
Outremer’s rulers faced a problem that shaped the way they defended their conquests. Perhaps a few hundred thousand Franks lived across the four states, among a much larger native population. There were too few settlers to occupy the countryside densely. Instead, they concentrated their strength at places from which they could control roads and watch the frontier.
The short answer
- The tyranny of numbers. Perhaps a few hundred thousand Franks lived in the four states, ruling a much larger native population. Their numbers could not sustain dense settlement across the countryside. Castles and hired or local troops helped them hold ground, but every campaign drew on a limited supply of defenders.
- The maritime bargain. Ships connected Outremer to Europe and supported its wars. Genoa, Pisa and Venice provided them in return for self-governing quarters in ports including Acre and Tyre, and shares of customs and conquered ports. The arrangement brought essential help while giving the republics their own powerful interests in the states.
- Coexistence as necessity. Ruling a conquered population required daily cooperation. Frankish lords taxed Muslim farmers, traded through Muslim intermediaries and could ally with one emir against another. Raids and massacres belonged to this same world: practical accommodation allowed the states to function alongside recurring violence.
THE TURNING POINT
Ascalon, 1153 — the high-water mark. The last Fatimid fortress on the coast, Ascalon fell in 1153. Its capture brought the kingdom to its widest extent, but the new ground also had to be defended. At the same time Nur al-Din was consolidating Aleppo and Damascus into a hostile power, changing the balance inland.
What it changed
A brittle strength. A castle could hold up an attacker, but it needed supplies and might need relief. The loss of a field army would leave the narrow kingdom little time or space to gather replacements before its cities were exposed. Hattin will bring that danger into view.
The orders fill the gap. The kingdom had too few knights and no standing troops to occupy all its great castles. The military orders helped provide permanent garrisons, supported by resources from Europe. The next chapter examines how these fighting religious communities worked.
A culture that outlasts the states. The states also connected communities through sugar, textiles and trade routes, and through the movement of techniques and ideas in both directions. Exchange continued after the last stronghold fell. The epilogue considers this legacy.
The full answer, argued
“Colonial” identifies a settler elite that conquered land and extracted resources from a subject majority. That is an important part of Outremer. Yet the comparison can import modern assumptions about nation-states, racial ideology and metropolitan economies into a different medieval setting. “Frontier society” makes the Franks’ adaptation to Levantine life, reliance on local labor and allies, and alliances across religious lines easier to see. It can also obscure unequal rule. We need both insights: conquest gave the rulers power, while their position required constant negotiation with the society around them.
An interesting fact
Usama ibn Munqidh recalled praying in a small oratory beside al-Aqsa in Jerusalem, which the Templars, whom he called his friends, kept available to him. A newly arrived Frank twice seized him and turned him east, insisting that he should pray that way. The Templars removed the man and apologized: he had just arrived and had never seen a Muslim pray toward Mecca. Usama judged Franks long settled in the East better company than newcomers. His account gives us a Muslim visitor’s view of the difference between them.
This is the study layer of Crusader states (Outremer), chapter 3 of The Crusades, 1095–1291; the full index of the atlas is here.
Related questions
THE FREE PRINTABLE STUDY GUIDE
Get the printable study guide for The Crusades free. I’ll send you a few short letters, then one when a new atlas opens. That’s all. — Paul
NO TRACKING · YOUR ADDRESS IS USED FOR THE DISPATCH AND NOTHING ELSE · UNSUBSCRIBE ANYTIME